Foreigners are always confused by the large Muslim population in India. They ask two questions: (1) If Pakistan was created specially for Indian Muslims in 1947 (because they did not want to live among Kafir Hindus) why is India riddled with such a large Muslim population? and (2) If religion was the reason for partition then why was India not declared a Hindu Rashtra?
Both these questions acquire particular significance because in the 1946 general election 90% Muslim voters voted in favor of a separate Islamic nation, Pakistan.
The answer to both the queries is same: the absurd and self destructive Muslim appeasement politics of Gandhi and Nehru. Although both were British puppets, but the obsession with Muslim appeasement was solely their own creation and they took it to extreme limits. If Gandhi was killed in January 1948 (just a few months after formal partition) his almost neurotic obsession to serve the interests of Muslims and Pakistan (blatantly ignoring Hindu interests) was the prime reason.
To any neutral observer their conduct would appear completely nonsensical. For instance, they begged/requested them to stay in India, as if in competition with Jinnah! In yet another form of Muslim appeasement gesture, Gandhi even sat for “Fast” to force India to immediately release the trench of Rs 55 crore to Pakistan while Jinnah attacked Kashmir! People were even worried that Gandhi would agree to creation of a land corridor (20-50 km wide) to connect East and west Pakistan. And as trains filled with bodies of Hindus and Sikhs started arriving from Pakistan, Gandhi became a hate symbol and people chanted death to Gandhi. His inability to see suddenly changed realities and the usual habit of not listening to people around him, ultimately cost him life in Jan 30, 1948.
Many leaders wanted full exchange of Muslim and non-Muslim population. Visionary Dr Amdedkar even presented a plan for complete populations exchange between Hindu-India and Muslim-India (Pakistan), but Nehru remained committed to playing host to the traitor mullahs and started rewarded them with posts and positions! Almost overnight, traitor mullahs became “nationalists” and even “freedom fighters” by joining Congress!
Since history of partition was written by Islamist/Leftist writers in collaboration with Nehru Congress, it remained limited to glorifying Gandhi and Nehru, maligning Hindus and hiding the hypocrisy of the ‘Pakistan Creators‘ who did not migrate to Pakistan. For all these decades, these traitor Muslims and their descendants have been living like hostile and cocky aliens, considering themselves above Indian Constitution and Indian laws. These toxic mullahs expose themselves when they threaten: “We were only 7 crores when we broke India in 1947; today we are 20 crore”! Or when they disturb social peace by shouting and demanding Jinnah Wali Azadi! Neurotic Hindu phobia is their prime defining characteristic. For instance, there is a Muslim member of parliament from Hyderabad who can’t stop dreaming genocide of all 100 crore Hindus in 15 minutes! In the beginning of year 2020 they hijacked a street in Delhi for several weeks to stage a ‘minority’ victim drama for global display to demonize Hindus and malign their ancient land and then launched a bloody Jihad in Delhi that killed over 50 people. Then there are crooked mullahs who proudly announce their plans to cut of the “chicken neck” (narrow strip of land that connects 6 States in the North East) by inviting foreign Muslims like Rohingyas to settle in Assam.
Behaving like prisoners of Islam, as in the British India, most madarsa trained mullahs still remain completely maladjusted in Indian society. Most objectionable, many of them raise kids feeding them Hindu-hatred which makes them ideal raw material for criminal activities. “Jinnah Muslims” generally justify their presence in India with this standard LIE: “We had a choice in 1947 but we did not go to Pakistan and consciously chose to stay in India”. Nothing can be more ridiculous and more deceitful. It is also devoid of commonsense. But it tells one thing clearly — that all their Islamic hysteria to create Islamic Pakistan was plain hypocrisy and a destructive nonsense. Their actions proved that they are habitual traitors: they first betrayed India by dividing it in the name of ISLAM and then they betrayed their own ‘Islamic paradise’ by not migrating there — and now they have again put their betraying mindset on display.
Watch this video before reading further
“Jinnah Muslim” means a Traitor Muslim
What have Jinnah Muslims contributed to India? Reflecting their ghetto tendency their contribution is uniquely contrived: they create “Sensitive Areas”, fancy media phrase for Muslim ghettos or mini-Pakistans where non-Muslims can’t live safely. They habitually malign or demonize Hindus and attack Hindu culture. They appear closer to Pakistan, Turkey and the ISIS, Taliban, Al Qaeda, Jaish-e-Mohammad, Lashkar-e-Toiba.
The global community only knows about shia and sunni Muslims, but Indian Muslims have created an additional exotic Islamic species, “Jinnah Muslims” ! This newer destructive Islamic gene appeared in the colonial India and it specializes in breaking societies (as in 1947 and 1971), in the name of Islam.
In India, the word “Jinnah” is synonymous with a Muslim traitor who is ever ready to hurt India or Hindus. Previously, they were labeled “Mir Zafar” but English educated elitist Mohammad Ali Jinnah expanded the vocabulary. Language experts, however, can also give the fine difference between the two types of traitors. A “Mir Zafar” betrays his country for power or money, but a “Jinnah” is a more deadly Islamic virus – he betrays both his country as well as his own Muslim community. Jinnah performed this extraordinary feat when he ditched both India and his own Muslim community to create “Pakistan” – a fairy-tale Islamic paradise, a nation-state without history, geography or even a goal (other than hurting India!). Further, unlike “Mir Zafar” the “Jinnah virus” is infectious. It particularly infects the Indian mullahs who do not practice Prophet’s ‘religion of peace’; instead, they follow highly toxic Mullah’s Islam that turns it into a cult of obsessive hate and violence. With their treacherous conduct, the “Jinnah Muslims” are a shame both on other fellow Muslims and the founder of Islam.
Who are “Jinnah Muslims”?
Hindu-Phobia is the sole defining feature of Jinnah Muslims. They are violent and destructive.
They are followers of a treacherous Muslim separatist who lived in the first half of 20th century, Mohammad Ali Jinnah who worked hysterically to create a separate Islamic State, “Pakistan” purely due to neurotic Hindu-phobia. But after the “Islamic Paradise” was carved out, they developed cold feet and could not gather courage to migrate there – and many even came back after shifting there! Can you imagine someone working hard to build a dream home, but when the home is ready the person becomes phobic and decides to stay away from it! Yes, this absurdity is the prime defining feature of “Jinnah Muslims” – they are pure destroyers and absolutely untrustworthy.
They were born as separate group after the 1946 provincial Elections in the British era.
1946 Provincial Elections
In 1946, a general election was held in the provinces of the British India. Although the purpose was to form representative provincial governments, but Jinnah’s Muslim League turned it into a one-point referendum – Creation of Islamic PAKISTAN. Muslim League sought vote for PAKISTAN in the name of Islam and the nationalist Congress Party opposed its divisive agenda. The Muslim League leaders turned it almost into a “religious war” – that Muslims must win at any cost! The funniest things was that no one, including Jinnah, had the slightest idea about the actual contour or location of PAKISTAN when the elections were held !!
So, how did the Muslim League run its campaign? In fact, long before the elections, the Jinnah gang was using a “Fairy-Tale” map of PAKISTAN dreamed by a freak mullah Chaudhary Rahmat Ali in the 1930s ! In his fictional map, PAKISTAN was spread all over India, with the biggest chunk covering almost the entire North and North West of colonial India. It showed “Hindu India” dotted with several islands of Islamic Pakistan. Thus, they fooled Muslim voters into believing that their Islamic paradise “Pakistan” would be created just “next-door” and sought voted for the Muslim League with all their Islamic zeal! Their religious hysteria can be seen from the slogans they shouted all over India — most vocally in the United Province, Central Province, Bombay, Hyderabad, Bihar etc. [None of these areas formed Pakistan.]
Lad Ke Lenge Pakistan! Mar Ke Lenge Pakistan!
Bant Ke Rahega Hindustan, Ban Ke Rahega Pakistan!
In those days, elections were based on the Sixth Schedule of the 1935 Government of India Act that allowed a limited franchise. Only those adults, who had money and property, had the voting right. On that yardstick only 3% of the population could vote for the Central Assembly and only 13% could vote for the Provincial Assemblies. Of the total adult population of 120 million, only 30 million were eligible to vote for the assembly elections. Further, seats were reserved for Muslims where only Muslim candidates would contest.
Muslim Voters
Now coming to the Muslim voters. According to 1941 census, Muslim population was 94 million. Of which less than 7% had the right to vote – they formed 14% of the adult Muslim population. So, 86% of adult Muslims in British India did not have the right to vote. In the 1946 provincial assembly elections, the Muslim League got 4.5 million of about 6 million casted Muslim votes.
Who Really wanted ‘Pakistan‘?
Only those Muslim elites (ML leaders, rich elites and their associates) who thought they would gain politically and economically wanted creation of ‘Pakistan’. They might be rightly labeled, carpetbaggers – opportunistic and exploitative. They shamelessly misused religion purely for their personal gains. For rest of the 93% ordinary Muslims without voting-right, ‘Pakistan’ proposition was certainly “Islamic” and hence, appealing, but they had to worry about other pressing issues of daily living. Thus, they largely remained unconcerned. The British too knew it well. Viceroy Lord Wavell wrote to Lord Pethick Lawrence, Secretary of State for India, on 20 November, 1945:
“[A] vote of the whole adult population or of the enfranchised population would be unlikely to provide the result that Jinnah requires.”
Here is the fairy Pakistan map on which Jinnah gang sought Muslim votes and election results are presented in the image here.
The vote for Muslim League – and hence, Pakistan – was overwhelming! Jinnah’s Muslim League secured 89.5% votes, compared with Congress Party’s pathetic 4.5% Muslim Votes. Rest of the 6% votes also went to other Islamic fundamentalist parties. Therefore, almost 95% voters opted for creation of Islamic PAKISTAN! Jinnah won from the Byculla Muslim Seat of Bombay City, with thumping majority. So the verdict was clear: Indian Muslim voters wanted to live separately from Hindus in the proposed Islamic Pakistan. At this point the British had not worked out the land boundary of the “Islamic Paradise.” And for the Jinnah gang and Muslim voters, it was all in imagination, in their heads! But it was enough to turn them fanatic, bordering on lunacy!!
Election Results: Victory of Islam!!
Creation of Pakistan was a “fabulous victory of Islam”! It made them ecstatic. Reflecting their traditional plundering mindset, the fanatics boastfully projected themselves as ‘Islamic Warriors’ who forcibly tore Hindu India and created an “Islamic State”!
V S Naipaul narrated a story of Muslim ecstasy after “winning” the “Pakistan”!
“In 1979, I met a man who told me what creation of Pakistan meant for the Muslims and the hysteria associated with it. He said, “To me it was like God”…. To many, or most, Muslims of the subcontinent the State that been won out of India (of Hindus) came as a kind of religious ecstasy…”
Results clearly established the following things:
A. Overall, the elite Indian Muslims (who had the voting right) almost unanimously wanted a separate “Muslim-India” called PAKISTAN: Compared with the last 1937 elections, the Muslim League gained substantial popularity, practically in all provinces of the British India. (It happened because the entire Congress leadership was locked up in jails for several years after the ill-planned QUIT INDIA call by Gandhi in 1941) For instance, in Bihar it went from zero to 34 out of 40 reserved seats; in Madras from 9 to all 29 seats. Thus, the verdict for “Pakistan” was unequivocal, well supported by 95% Muslim voters.
B. Muslim voters of today’s “Pakistan” did not support Jinnah’s Muslim League: West Pakistan was to be formed by combining the NWFP and Sind provinces with half of Punjab (and the Balochistan Princely State was to be grabbed forcibly). Notice the Muslim League performance in the NWFP and Sind — and compare it with rest of the provinces. In NWFP is could not win even half of the reserved seats. Congress formed the government in NWFP led by Gandhian Abdul Gaffar Khan. In Sind the ML did win 28 out of 34 reserved Muslim seats but it had to form a coalition government, after a ‘murder’. The fate of Balochistan was already sealed through a secret agreement between the British and Muslim League (it was revealed in a debate in the British Parliament). Thus, the Baloch became accidental victims due to location of Balochistan.
Location of Pakistan
Here comes the harsh truth. The colonial British had consciously fueled separatist ghetto mentality present among Muslims through the puppet Muslim League, as part of their future game plan: protecting their oil interests in Iran and the gulf region through military bases, and to counter Soviet expansionist after WW2. United India would be democratic and too big a country to be manipulated easily. But having a tiny Islamic State would be ideal because from their experience they knew it would be authoritative and dictatorial; such state are always easy to manipulate. Their partition plan was sketched on the map by a British architect, Cyril Radcliffe, who merely drew lines as instructed. Mr Radcliffe had never visited India and had absolutely no inkling of Hindu-Muslim dynamics or Islamic separatism.
Therefore, what became the West Pakistan, next to Afghanistan, was a British strategy. Therefore, the Sind and NWFP Provinces and independent Balochistan were destined to be merged with the partitioned Punjab to create the “West Pakistan”. East Bengal (Muslim dominated part of united Bengal Province) was of no strategic interest to them. As far Jinnah, without Calcutta East Bengal was useless; he wasn’t interested in ‘inferior Bengali Muslims’! If the Bengali Muslims fell for the delusion of “Islamic Brotherhood” and opted to join Pakistan, it was a terrible mistake and they corrected it in 1971 when the “Jinnah mullahs” of West Pakistan betrayed them after general elections!
Hard Truth: Holding on to the medieval thinking, Muslims talk of ‘Umma‘, pan global Islamic brotherhood. But reality contradicts it. “Muslim Umma” is only about fighting together, it is not at all about living together!! Why else are there 55+ separate Muslim countries, in place of just one country on the planet?
REAL Map of Pakistan shocked “Jinnah Muslims”
When the real map of Pakistan was made public on August 17, 1947, it came almost as a lightening strike on the ‘Pakistan dreamers’ including Jinnah. It was just two tiny plots of land separated by a 1000 mile of Indian territory. Shell shocked, Jinnah called what he got — “a maimed, mutilated and moth-eaten” Pakistan ! The ‘Islamic Heaven’ was not ‘around the corner’ or ‘in the neighborhood’; it was too far, too distant and too small to be heavenly! The colonial British were least bothered about mullahs dreams. Majority of the die-hard ‘Pakistan fanatics’ lost the will to migrate. It exposed the shallowness of their craze for living in Islamic society. All the hysteria associated with what they glorified as ‘Pakistan Movement‘ and fought for it with murderous hysteria, wasn’t really for love of Islam. It was merely jihadi hate-cry against Hindus when they chanted
Lad Ke Lenge Pakistan! Mar Ke Lenge Pakistan! Bat Ke Rahega Hindustan, Ban Ke Rahega Pakistan!
Their strange behavior was noted by all, particularly in the provinces like UP, CP, Bihar, Madras, Assam where the “hysteria for Pakistan” was at its extreme. Did these traitor “Jinnah Muslims” with psychotic Hindu-hatred suddenly discover that living among Kafirs in Hindu-India was better than living in the “Sharia Heaven” among Muslims? In a speech in Calcutta in January 1948, Sardar Patel publically highlighted this weird behavior,
“Most of the Muslims who have stayed back in Hindustan, helped in creating Pakistan. Now, I don’t understand what has changed in one night that they are asking us not to doubt their loyalty”.
The 1951 census data shows that the Muslim population of those provinces dropped only by one to two percent compared with their numbers in 1941. It means the overwhelming majority of Muslims in these provinces did not migrate to Pakistan.
The treacherous behavior of ‘Jinnah Muslims’ was also highlighted in the 1951 Pakistan census data. Of all the Muslims who came from India, the overwhelming majority came from Punjab and then from Alwar and Jodhpur – together they accounted for (80.1%) of total immigrants. Actually these were the areas where Hindus forced the traitor mullahs to leave. In comparison, only 6.4% came from Delhi and UP (more from Delhi and less from UP), 2.2% from Maharashtra and Gujarat, 1.2% from Bhopal and Hyderabad, and trickle 0.2% from Madras and Mysore in South India. These were the areas where mullahs most fanatically and violently demanded creation of “Islamic State of Pakistan”.
It is understandable if the poor Muslims could not migrate because long distance travel. was difficult for them. Moreover, since they did not have voting right no one knows about their opinion. But why didn’t 95% rich Muslims leave India after breaking the country in the name of Islam? For instance, Bhopal’s Nawab Family did not migrated to Pakistan. If today, actor Saif Ali Khan of this elite nawab family claims that there was no India before the Mughal, he is only propagating the distorted brained mullah view on India. Despite the wealth and elite status he is no better than a typical Deobandi/Barelvi madarsa product.
By not migrating to Pakistan Jinnah’s disciples proved that their neurotic hysteria for ‘Pakistan’ was a mere Jihadi war cry and a dishonest drama and that they were just playing with ‘Islam’ as a toy without any trace of sincerity or respect towards their Prophet or Quran.
But there was a highly insightful man, Dr Ambedkar, who also witnessed this utterly irresponsible and destructive Islamic behavior. He argued: If Islam is so intolerant, let there be a complete segregation of Muslims and non-Muslims. Dr Ambedkar wanted all Muslims to be sent to Pakistan and even presented a plan to do it! However, his opinion remained ignored by Gandhi and Nehru, whose obsession for Muslim appeasement was as absurd as mullahs fanaticism for separate Islamic State. Today this virus of ‘appeasement’ has grown into a monster threatening India’s integrity. Today India is literally sitting on a Jihadi volcano.
In this video Dr Rizwan exposes the propaganda of Mughal Greatness.
Why the British Created West Pakistan at that Location
‘Pakistan’ (truncated Punjab) was imposed on the people of Sind, NWFP and Balochistan to serve future British geopolitical interests post WW2.
The most weird thing about creation of Pakistan was that all the provinces where Muslims were most hysteric about Pakistan remained with Hindu-India. It means dominant majority of real Muslim traitors who conspired to break the country stayed in India
Britain’s interest was primarily to have a rather small puppet Islamic State (West Pakistan) next to Afghanistan, in order to safeguard their future geopolitical interests in Iran and gulf region and to prevent Russian expansionism towards Indian Ocean. The Muslim League and the fanatic Jinnah gang were mere pawns in their game plan.
They wanted to merge Sindh and NWFP with divided Punjab and then force Balochistan to merge with this entity. In fact, Mountbatten’s prime task was to ensure that the West Pakistan emerged in this shape. Nehru and Azad clearly connived and looked the other way. They chose to betray the Pashtuns led by Frontier Gandhi, Khan Abdul Gaffar Khan, and also the Baloch princely State that looked towards India for help.
The 1946 elections threw a peculiar situation. In none of provinces that were meant to ‘become Pakistan’ Muslim League could form government on its own. In fact, in NWFP Congress formed government with the help of Gaffar Khan’s party and in Punjab Congress and Unionist formed government. Only in Bengal, Muslim League formed government but only with support from independents. In Sindh, a murder and manipulation enabled ML form government.
‘Jinnah Muslims’ who migrated to Pakistan were Ill-Treated
ISLAM is the only political ideology in the world where Muslims can persecute each other, in the name of ISLAM!!!
In the “ISLAMIC Paradise“, Jinnah’s disciples started persecuting non-Muslims — nothing new in that. But they also became enemies of Ahmediyas, Mohajirs (Muslim migrants from India), Shias, Hazara, .. and practically everyone who disagreed. Strange, in an Islamic State even Muslims are not safe!
Those “Jinnah Muslims” who dared to migrate to Pakistan under religious hysteria were also up for a rude Islamic shock. As the Urdu speaking Bihari Muslims began to arrive into Pakistan (mostly Sindh area) and started settling, the locals resented. They did not like the arrival of “outsider refugees” in their neighborhood. Even violent clashed took place. When the news reached the Pakistan dreamer “Jinnah Muslims” in India, they developed cold feet and decided to stay away from their Islamic Paradise! just think about it. It is absolutely weird that the paradise of their own creation terrified them!
As the Islamic hysteria faded away and human sense returned, “Jinnah Muslims” were forced to face the realities of human life. They ultimately came to the conclusion that it was less risky to stay in the familiar area among Kafir Hindus than going to live in an unfamiliar hostile Islamic society ! Here is a typical testimony from rich Muslims: “We were rich and property holders. Migrating to Pakistan meant losing our land, wealth and prestige and starting all over again on a blank slate.” Clearly, their “Islamic hysteria” was devoid of sincerity and conviction or even love for religion.
As far as Hindus, their way of living is guided by the openness of Vasudev Kutumbakam thinking and don’t see people of other beliefs as enemies. So they remained unconcerned whether Muslims stay or leave. In some areas such as Delhi and Alwar they did get assertive and forced Muslims to leave, but that was more for settling “past personal scores” than any ethnic cleansing to create a Hindu only India.
“Jinnah Muslims” Excuses (Lies) for not Migrating to Pakistan!!
Hindu-India, then they betrayed Islamic-Pakistan. But this is the hall mark of all political Islamic cults including Deobandi and Barelvi..
After Jinnah Muslims concluded that their Islamic paradise is after all not that Heavenly, they started inventing excuses or reasons to stay back in Hindu-India. Most of these excuses range from casual to childish to ridiculous. Here are the thoughtless Excuses (Lies) of two prominent Muslim League leaders for staying back:
Nawab Mohammad Ismail Khan of Meerut, who campaigned extensively for Pakistan and was considered Jinnah’s heir, stayed in India after Partition. His excuse: “How can I leave my brethren here behind me?” Pakistan felicitated him with a postage stamp and the traitor lived in India!
In Madras, a Muhammad Ismail vehemently campaigned for Pakistan but did not migrate. When asked why, his response was: “The creation of Pakistan is beneficial not only to Muslims of Pakistan, it is also beneficial to Muslims of India……The Muslims of India are proud of having achieved Pakistan. A Muslim is always a Muslim. A Muslim first and a Muslim last.”
Like all madarsa mullahs, this Ismail fellow was also a prisoner of the Book and more like a frog of the Islamic well! Then he defiantly founded the Indian Union Muslim League (IULM) – and claimed it to be “secular” and “Nationalist”! A Muslim League that’s Nationalist and Secular !! One has to be a perfect moron or rain-dead to believe this claim.
Now the most ridiculous excuse: Pakistan was too small, so we could not go there!
Finally, Muslims settled for the standard excuse (Lie) to appear “nationalistic”:
“In 1947, we had a CHOICE but we consciously chose to stay in India!!”
I wonder, why no one ever asked them: Who gave you the second CHOICE; you had already forcefully CHOSEN Pakistan?
Nor anyone ever tried reminding them their lunatic hysteria:
Lad Ke Lenge Pakistan! Mar Ke Lenge Pakistan!
Bant Ke Rahega Hindustan, Ban Ke Rahega Pakistan!
Other Factors that Held Back Jinnah Muslims
Gandhi’s Highly Toxic Muslim Appeasement Policy
Both Gandhi and Nehru actively started forcing/begging Muslims to not leave India. Nehru even compromised his ‘secular’ ideology and dumped implementation of the Uniform Civil Code to comfort the change-phobic Muslim clergy.
In 1950, Nehru signed an agreement with Liaquat Ali apparently to safeguard minorities – but it was more of Azad’s ploy to hold back Muslims in India — and emerge as their leader. In another absurdity, Nehru and Azad duo even encouraged Mohajir Muslims (who had gone to Pakistan but did not feel accepted there) to return to India. Thus, a million Muslims returned from East Pakistan and several lakhs from West Pakistan. Many Congress leaders opposed this policy and even resigned. But Islamo-philic Nehru was behaving like a narrow visioned Muslim leader, not as a far sighted national leader of Hindu majority India.
Then in 1952, Pakistan closed its border making migration still harder.
Maulana Azad’s Islamic Politics
This Saudi born Maulana worked solely for Muslim interests from the Congress platform. His performance as Congress President during the crucial 1940-46 period was pathetic, as the 1946 elections proved. A cursory glance at his biography and speeches clearly suggested that like most Muslim politicians his vision was also badly limited to serving narrow “Islamic cause”. He lacked broader mindset required to create a socially integrated, united and strong India where 90% people were non-Muslim. Hindus were totally missing from his distorted Islamic vision. His differences with radical Islamic organizations and Muslim League were only in approach, the goal remained the same – promotion of Islam and dominance of Muslims in India. If he opposed partition of India, it was only because he felt that in the united India Muslims would be in far bigger numbers and hence would have far stronger voice.
Maulana Azad’s dirty mind exposed after 40 years
As a minister, Azad favored Pakistan in every possible way. The biggest damage this Maulana did to India was as HRD minister. He distorted history to ensure that only pro-Muslim history is taught in Hindu-India ! Thus, all instances of Muslim atrocities on Hindus and Temple destructions or “forced conversions” during centuries of Muslim rule vanished from history books. That’s why Mughal rule is projected as the most glorious period of Indian history – even secular at times!! Hindu and Sikh heroes either got confined to footnotes or villainized or demonized so that the barbaric invaders and Muslim rulers appear saintly.
Explore Further
Why Non-Muslim Refugees from Pakistan wanted Gandhi to Die?
Why Dr Ambedkar wanted to send all Muslims to Pakistan
Maulana Azad’s dirty game plan exposed 40 years after his death
Issues and Challenges in India 